Fathom Analytics vs. Umami
Fathom Analytics and Umami compared across Company facts, Pricing, Analytics capabilities, Privacy & compliance, Data ownership & deployment and Platform & integrations — every fact sourced and re-verified from each vendor's public material.
Fathom Analytics
Privacy-first, cookieless web analytics with a simple dashboard and forever data retention.
Umami
Open-source, privacy-focused web analytics available self-hosted or as a managed cloud service.
Company facts
Pricing
Analytics capabilities
Privacy & compliance
Data ownership & deployment
Platform & integrations
The verdict
Fathom is the simpler hosted pick: $15/mo entry vs Umami's $20, an official WordPress plugin, GA4 import, and forever data retention (Umami's Pro caps at 24 months). Trade-offs: closed-source and cloud-only, no funnels, no heatmaps, and exports are aggregated CSVs only, not raw data.
Full profileUmami is MIT open-source and self-hostable, with a free Hobby tier Fathom lacks. It adds funnels, heatmaps, raw data export, and EU data residency, and meters 1M events vs Fathom's 100k pageviews. Gaps: $20/mo entry, only 24-month cloud retention, no GA import, and no official WordPress plugin.
Full profileSources · 36 verified references
Affiliate disclosure. DecisionWire may earn a commission when you sign up through links on this page. Commissions never influence our data, scores, or rankings.