Fathom Analytics vs. PostHog
Fathom Analytics and PostHog compared across Company facts, Pricing, Analytics capabilities, Privacy & compliance, Data ownership & deployment and Platform & integrations — every fact sourced and re-verified from each vendor's public material.
Fathom Analytics
Privacy-first, cookieless web analytics with a simple dashboard and forever data retention.
PostHog
All-in-one open-source platform for product analytics, web analytics, session replay, and feature flags.
Company facts
Pricing
Analytics capabilities
Privacy & compliance
Data ownership & deployment
Platform & integrations
The verdict
Fathom is cookieless by design and states no consent banner is needed, where PostHog's default config requires one. Its 2 KB script is far lighter than PostHog's 66.7 KB payload, retention is unlimited rather than capped at 84 months, and the entry plan covers 50 sites vs 6. An official WordPress plugin ships; PostHog has none.
Full profilePostHog runs a perpetual free tier (1M events) and is MIT-licensed and self-hostable, while Fathom is proprietary, cloud-only, and starts at $15/mo with no free tier. It adds funnels, heatmaps, and raw event-level export that Fathom lacks, plus EU data residency in Frankfurt where Fathom stores analytics data on US servers.
Full profileSources · 38 verified references
Affiliate disclosure. DecisionWire may earn a commission when you sign up through links on this page. Commissions never influence our data, scores, or rankings.